Foreign Judgments - Quebec Law 1996



Footnote: 1    Along these lines, see L.E. Teiz, "Taking Multiple Bites of the Apple: A Proposal to Resolve Conflicts of Jurisdiction and Multiple Proceedings" (1992) 26 International Lawyer 21, p. 26.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 2    «3151. A Québec authority has exclusive jurisdiction to hear in first instance all actions founded on liability under article 3129.»
«3165. The jurisdiction of a foreign authority is not recognized by Québec authorities in the following cases:
(1) where, by reason of the subject matter or an agreement between the parties, Québec law grants exclusive jurisdiction to its authorities to hear the action which gave rise to the foreign decision;
(2) where, by reason of the subject matter or an agreement between the parties, Québec law recognizes the exclusive jurisdiction of another foreign authority;
(3) where Québec law recognizes an agreement by which exclusive jurisdiction has been conferred upon an arbitrator.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 3    «3149. A Québec authority also has jurisdiction to hear an action involving a consumer contract or a contract of employment if the consumer or worker has his domicile or residence in Québec; the waiver of such jurisdiction by the consumer or worker may not be set up against him.»

«3150. A Québec authority has jurisdiction to hear an action based on a contract of insurance where the holder, the insured or the beneficiary of the contract is domiciled or resident in Québec, the contract is related to an insurable interest situated in Québec or the loss took place in Québec.»
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 4    Second paragraph of art. 3520: "However, recognition or enforcement of a foreign decision shall be refused where its outcome is contrary to public order or to a rule of Québec law which is applicable by reason of its particular object [this should instead read: object of vital interest], or where the decision imperils or significantly affects the proper functioning of the State or is manifestly unreasonable." It would of course be necessary to discuss the exact wording of such a provision.
«The application of the rules of this Code is imperative in matters of civil liability for damage suffered in or outside Québec as a result of exposure to or the use of raw materials, whether processed or not, originating in Québec.»
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 5         «3148. In personal actions of a patrimonial nature, a Québec authority has jurisdiction where
(1) the defendant has his domicile or his residence in Québec;
(2) the defendant is a legal person, is not domiciled in Québec but has an establishment in Québec, and the dispute relates to its activities in Québec;
(3) a fault was committed in Québec, damage was suffered in Québec, an injurious act occurred in Québec or one of the obligations arising from a contract was to be performed in Québec;
(4) the parties have by agreement submitted to it all existing or future disputes between themselves arising out of a specified legal relationship;
(5) the defendant submits to its jurisdiction.
However, a Québec authority has no jurisdiction where the parties, by agreement, have chosen to submit all existing or future disputes between themselves relating to a specified legal relationship to a foreign authority or to an arbitrator, unless the defendant submits to the jurisdiction of the Québec authority.»
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 6    «3155. A Québec authority recognizes and, where applicable, declares enforceable any decision rendered outside Québec except in the following cases:
(1) the authority of the country where the decision was rendered had no jurisdiction under the provisions of this Title;
(2) the decision is subject to ordinary remedy or is not final or enforceable at the place where it was rendered;
(3) the decision was rendered in contravention of the fundamental principles of procedure;
(4) a dispute between the same parties, based on the same facts and having the same object has given rise to a decision rendered in Québec, whether it has acquired the authority of a final judgment (res judicata) or not, or is pending before a Québec authority, in first instance, or has been decided in a third country and the decision meets the necessary conditions for recognition in Québec;
(5) the outcome of a foreign decision is manifestly inconsistent with public order as understood in international relations;
(6) the decision enforces obligations arising from the taxation laws of a foreign country.»
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 7    See TEITZ, supra, pp. 28-29.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 8    «3139. Where a Québec authority has jurisdiction to rule on the principal demand, it also has jurisdiction to rule on an incidental demand or a cross demand.»
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 9    «3156. A decision rendered by default may not be recognized or declared enforceable unless the plaintiff proves that the act of procedure initiating the proceedings was duly served on the defaulting party in accordance with the law of the place where the decision was rendered.
However, the authority may refuse recognition or enforcement if the defaulting party proves that, owing to the circumstances, he was unable to learn of the act of procedure initiating the proceedings or was not given sufficient time to offer his defence.»
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote: 10         «3161. Where a foreign decision orders a debtor to pay a sum of money expressed in foreign currency, a Québec authority converts the sum into Canadian currency at the rate of exchange prevailing on the day the decision became enforceable at the place where it was rendered.

The determination of interest payable under a foreign decision is governed by the law of the authority that rendered the decision until its conversion.»

Next Annual Meeting

2018 Conference (Centennial)

Delta Hotel

Québec City, QC

August 12 - 16, 2018